GitHub[208K]Try OpenCode

Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B

  1. DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek
  2. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIAHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
Normalized model capability scores
ModelReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
DeepSeek V4 Pro100/100100/10034/10081/1000/10068/100
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3B0/10034/10086/10063/1000/10050/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
262K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$1.74/ 1M
$0.05/ 1M
Output
$3.48/ 1M
$0.20/ 1M
Cached input
$0.20/ 1M
$0.01/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
529K
266K
Completed sessions
1,375,904
7,076,826
Token share
0.63%
0.44%
Tokens
6.4T-81%
4.5T+245%
AUG 24OCT 18
AUG 24OCT 18
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
60.7%56K user-weeks
Pending

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.